Review



streptococcus pyogenes  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 99
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    ATCC streptococcus pyogenes
    Streptococcus Pyogenes, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1477 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/streptococcus pyogenes/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1477 article reviews
    streptococcus pyogenes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    streptococcus pyogenes  (ATCC)
    99
    ATCC streptococcus pyogenes
    Streptococcus Pyogenes, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/streptococcus pyogenes/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    streptococcus pyogenes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    streptococcus  (ATCC)
    96
    ATCC streptococcus
    **Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed when Staphylococcus aureus was compared with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae , indicating a markedly greater sensitivity of the Gram-positive strain. *Moderately significant differences ( p < 0.01) were noted between Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis , <t>Streptococcus</t> pyogenes , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa .
    Streptococcus, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/streptococcus/product/ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    streptococcus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    streptococcus pyogenes atcc 19615  (ATCC)
    99
    ATCC streptococcus pyogenes atcc 19615
    **Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed when Staphylococcus aureus was compared with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae , indicating a markedly greater sensitivity of the Gram-positive strain. *Moderately significant differences ( p < 0.01) were noted between Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis , <t>Streptococcus</t> pyogenes , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa .
    Streptococcus Pyogenes Atcc 19615, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/streptococcus pyogenes atcc 19615/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    streptococcus pyogenes atcc 19615 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    99/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    atcc 19615  (ATCC)
    97
    ATCC atcc 19615
    **Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed when Staphylococcus aureus was compared with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae , indicating a markedly greater sensitivity of the Gram-positive strain. *Moderately significant differences ( p < 0.01) were noted between Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis , <t>Streptococcus</t> pyogenes , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa .
    Atcc 19615, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/atcc 19615/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    atcc 19615 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    97/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    **Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed when Staphylococcus aureus was compared with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae , indicating a markedly greater sensitivity of the Gram-positive strain. *Moderately significant differences ( p < 0.01) were noted between Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis , Streptococcus pyogenes , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa .

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Antioxidant and antibacterial potential of bioactive extraction from Cadaba glandulosa leaves

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344664

    Figure Lengend Snippet: **Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed when Staphylococcus aureus was compared with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae , indicating a markedly greater sensitivity of the Gram-positive strain. *Moderately significant differences ( p < 0.01) were noted between Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis , Streptococcus pyogenes , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa .

    Article Snippet: The study employed various bacterial strains, including Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603.

    Techniques:

    Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). (A) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Staphylococcus aureus ; (B) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Streptococcus pyogenes ; (C) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Bacillus subtilis ; (D) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Escherichia coli ; (E) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; and (F) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Klebsiella pneumoniae . *Moderately significant difference at p < 0.01, and ** Highly significant difference at p < 0.001 between MLCG and ciprofloxacin for each bacterial strain.

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Antioxidant and antibacterial potential of bioactive extraction from Cadaba glandulosa leaves

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344664

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). (A) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Staphylococcus aureus ; (B) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Streptococcus pyogenes ; (C) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Bacillus subtilis ; (D) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Escherichia coli ; (E) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; and (F) Effect of MLCG and ciprofloxacin on Klebsiella pneumoniae . *Moderately significant difference at p < 0.01, and ** Highly significant difference at p < 0.001 between MLCG and ciprofloxacin for each bacterial strain.

    Article Snippet: The study employed various bacterial strains, including Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603.

    Techniques: